You will learn
- Define fallacy.
- Spot common fallacies.
- Explain why they are flawed.
- Fix flawed reasoning.
Version 0.2 · expanded edition · built from cited public sources Content is based on the official frameworks and sources listed under Sources and standards. No official endorsement is claimed. Written in the style of common primary school assessments. No exam result is promised.
Student lesson
- Find the claim.
- Check the reasoning.
- Name any fallacy.
- Repair it.
Words to know
a flaw in reasoning
a broad claim from too little evidence
attacking the person instead of the argument
pretending there are only two options
1. Discover: Flawed arguments
Kemi hears: “Two pupils from Class A were late, so Class A is always late.” (hasty generalisation) “You cannot argue about homework; you never do yours!” (personal attack) “Either we ban all phones or the school will fall apart.” (either/or thinking) “I wore my lucky socks and we won, so the socks caused it.” (false cause)
Each is a fallacy: a flaw in reasoning. Kemi fixes them with evidence and fairness.
Think: Why are these arguments weak?
2. Understand: Spotting weak reasoning
Idea 1: Fallacies
A fallacy is a flaw in reasoning that can fool readers.
Idea 2: Common ones
Hasty generalisation, personal attack, either/or thinking, false cause.
Idea 3: Repair
Repair fallacies with more evidence, fair claims and attention to the argument itself.
3. Worked examples
Example 1 (I show you): Generalisation
Which is hasty?
- Class A always late.
Answer: two late pupils so class a is always late
Example 2 (We do it together): Attack
What is a personal attack?
- You never do homework.
Answer: attacking the person not the argument
Example 3 (You try): Either/or
What is wrong with either/or?
Show the steps and answer
- Only two options.
Answer: it pretends there are only two options
Did you know?
Learning fallacies helps you spot weak adverts and speeches.
Why this matters
Evaluating reasoning makes you a critical thinker.
4. Explore: Fallacy finder
Spot fallacies.
- Read arguments.
- Name the claim.
- Name any fallacy.
- Fix the reasoning.
Think about it: what did you notice?
You can evaluate reasoning.
5. Practise
Say it in a sentence
Use these starters when you talk about the lesson. Say them out loud.
- The fallacy is ___.
- It is flawed because ___.
- A fairer version is ___.
- The evidence needed is ___.
Guided practice
Question 1. A flaw in reasoning is a ___.
fallacy
Question 2. A broad claim from too little evidence is a hasty ___.
generalisation
Question 3. Attacking the person is a personal ___.
attack
Independent practice
Level 1: Start
- A flaw in reasoning is a ___.
- A broad claim from too little evidence is a hasty ___.
- Attacking the person is a personal ___.
- Pretending there are only two options is ___ thinking.
- Two pupils from Class A were ___.
Level 2: Grow
- What did the lucky socks supposedly cause?
- What is the either/or claim about phones?
- Which attack was made?
Level 3: Stretch
- Is a personal attack fair?
- Can fallacies fool readers?
- Should reasoning be checked?
Answers are in the answer key below. Try first, then check.
6. Apply: English in everyday life
Find and fix two fallacies in everyday arguments.
Show a sample answer
two fixes
Another one. Spot a fallacy in an advert or speech with a family member.
Show a sample answer
a completed task
7. Common mistakes
Fix: Slow down and check your work.
Fix: Study the example first, then try.
8. Lesson summary and revision card
- I can define fallacy.
- I can spot common fallacies.
- I can explain why they are flawed.
- I can fix flawed reasoning.
9. Check and master
Answer all 14 questions. You will see feedback after each one.
Your result appears here after you answer every question.
10. Key takeaways
- Find the claim.
- Check the reasoning.
- Name any fallacy.
- Repair it.
11. Next lesson
Next lesson: Short fiction. Keep going with the next idea in this course.
Exam practice
These questions are written in the style of common school and international primary assessments. Try them on your own, without looking back. Then check your answers in the marking guide. The marks are shown in brackets.
- Define fallacy. [1 mark]
- Name and explain two fallacies. [4 marks]
- Why is either/or thinking flawed? [1 mark]
- Fix: Two pupils were late so the class is always late. [2 marks]
- Explain how to evaluate reasoning. [3 marks]
Total: 11 marks.
Marking guide and model answers
- a flaw in reasoning [1]
- hasty generalisation [1] with explanation [1]; personal attack [1] with explanation [1]
- it ignores other options [1]
- gather more evidence [1]; make a fair claim such as some pupils were late [1]
- find the claim [1]; check for fallacies [1]; repair with evidence and fairness [1]
Score guide: 10 to 11 = secure. 7 to 9 = nearly there, revise the parts you missed. Under 7 = work through the lesson again with a grown-up.
Printable worksheet
- A flaw in reasoning is a ___.
- A broad claim from too little evidence is a hasty ___.
- Attacking the person is a personal ___.
- Pretending there are only two options is ___ thinking.
- Two pupils from Class A were ___.
- What did the lucky socks supposedly cause?
- What is the either/or claim about phones?
- Which attack was made?
- Is a personal attack fair?
- Can fallacies fool readers?
Homework
Spot a fallacy in an advert or speech with a family member.
Answer key and marking scheme
| Question | Expected response | Marks |
|---|---|---|
| 1. A flaw in reasoning is a ___. | fallacy | 1 |
| 2. A broad claim from too little evidence is a hasty ___. | generalisation | 1 |
| 3. Attacking the person is a personal ___. | attack | 1 |
| 4. Pretending there are only two options is ___ thinking. | either/or | 1 |
| 5. Two pupils from Class A were ___. | late | 1 |
| 6. What did the lucky socks supposedly cause? | a win | 1 |
| 7. What is the either/or claim about phones? | ban all phones or the school falls apart | 1 |
| 8. Which attack was made? | you never do your homework | 1 |
| 9. Is a personal attack fair? | no | 1 |
| 10. Can fallacies fool readers? | yes | 1 |
| Total | 10 |
Independent practice answers. Level 1: 1 fallacy; 2 generalisation; 3 attack; 4 either/or; 5 late. Level 2: 1 a win; 2 ban all phones or the school falls apart; 3 you never do your homework. Level 3: 1 no; 2 yes; 3 yes.
Quiz answers: 1 B, 2 C, 3 A, 4 B, 5 C, 6 A, 7 B, 8 C, 9 A, 10 B, 11 C, 12 A, Challenge 1 B, Challenge 2 C.
Mastery and remediation
| Objective | Bronze (Developing) | Silver (Proficient) | Gold (Advanced) |
|---|---|---|---|
| O1 Define fallacy | Shows this with help from an adult or a picture | Does this independently and explains how they know | Explains it clearly and uses it in a new situation |
| O2 Spot common fallacies | Shows this with help from an adult or a picture | Does this independently and explains how they know | Explains it clearly and uses it in a new situation |
| O3 Explain why they are flawed | Shows this with help from an adult or a picture | Does this independently and explains how they know | Explains it clearly and uses it in a new situation |
| O4 Fix flawed reasoning | Shows this with help from an adult or a picture | Does this independently and explains how they know | Explains it clearly and uses it in a new situation |
Courseversity badge thresholds (overall quiz score): Gold = 90–100%; Silver = 80–89.9%; Bronze = 70–79.9%. A badge is never a full record of progress.
If a learner struggles
- Find the misconception: Rushing without checking. Slow down and check your work.
- Explain another way: use real objects, pictures or actions first, then words.
- Show a simpler example: Re-read the examples slowly and use the sentence frames.
- Guided practice: work through one example together and let the learner try the next one.
- Reassess: use the quiz again or the worksheet.
- Move on when the learner shows Silver-level evidence independently.
For parents and guardians
In this lesson your child practises a key Grade 3 English skill with clear examples and a quiz. You do not need to be an expert to help.
- Listen while your child explains the idea.
- Ask for one new example.
- Praise effort and careful work.
- Ask “how do you know?” after each answer, and listen.
- Praise effort, not only right answers. Mistakes are how we learn.
- Ten to fifteen minutes a day is better than one long session.
Teacher package
1–5. Objectives, prerequisites, materials, preparation, duration
Lesson objectives. Learners will: define fallacy; spot common fallacies; explain why they are flawed; fix flawed reasoning.
Prerequisite knowledge. Revising arguments.
Materials. Chart paper or board, pencils, picture or word cards, a reading book if available. Low-resource options: use chalk or charcoal on a board or wall, drawings in the sand, and objects from the classroom instead of printed materials.
Preparation. Write the key words and examples on the board or on cards before the lesson.
Suggested duration. 45–60 minutes. It can be split into two shorter sessions.
6–9. Teaching procedure, explanation notes, guided and independent activities
Introduction (5 min). Introduce the idea with the opening example.
Explanation (10 min). Teach the key words.
Guided activity (10 min). Practise together.
Independent activity (10 min). Check understanding with the quiz.
Assessment and reflection (5 min). Ask each learner to say one thing they learned and how they know it.
Key questions. What is the key idea? Can I give my own example?
Teacher explanation notes. Move from the spoken word to pictures and then to print. Read aloud often, point to the words, and let learners hear and say before they read and write.
10–12. Differentiation, formative assessment, common misconceptions
Support. Use the sentence frames and work with a partner. Extension. Create a harder example of your own.
Formative assessment. Listen to learners read and explain, ask “how do you know?”, and check the independent work.
Misconceptions. Rushing without checking. Slow down and check your work.
13–15. Assessment questions, answer keys, marking scheme
Use the quiz, the 11-mark exam practice and the worksheet on this page. All answers and marking guides are in the answer sections above. Re-check every answer before use.
16–19. Remediation, enrichment, homework, teacher reflection
Remediation. Re-read the examples slowly and use the sentence frames. Enrichment. Make up your own example and teach it to someone at home. Homework. See above.
Teacher reflection. After teaching, record: which ideas learners understood; which misconceptions occurred; which activities worked; which learners need more practice; and what to improve next time.
Sources and standards
This lesson is based on the sources below, and no official endorsement is claimed. Reference starting points: Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts, Cambridge Primary and the IB Primary Years Programme. Where a standard code is named, it points to the official framework.
Official standards for this topic area. Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts (official site): Grade 6 » Writing; Grade 6 » Language. These pages list the standards that cover this topic area; read them alongside the lesson.
Research used to shape this lesson. Common Core RI.6.8 and W.6.1 (evaluate argument; distinguish claims supported by reasons and evidence); Cambridge Primary English Stage 6 (evaluating reasoning). These sources informed the lesson.